[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jordan: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:03:14PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > la djorden cusku di'e > > > > How about in "ge na broda lo brode gi ri brodo"? Would that be treated > > > > as gobbledygook? > > > > > >No. The referent of the "lo broda" is referred to by the "ri" (so > > >it's the *same* broda, and not the same as repeating "lo broda") > > > > There is no "referent of 'lo broda'" there. What does it mean > > to say: > > Ah; I was ignoring the "na". It probably is gobbledygook then. It > wouldn't be if it were "na'e" or something How about "ge broda ro brodi lo brode gi ri brodo"? Or even "ge broda lo brode gi ri brodo". What is their logical form? --And.