[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la and cusku di'e
> Do you want {lu'i lo'i broda} = {lo'i broda}?
I don't really care, so far. I hadn't seen a need for lu'i until
you pointed out that "lu'i su'o broda" can replace "lau'i broda".
I want lu'i lo'i broda to be the set that has lo'i broda as its only member rather than the set that has the members of lo'i broda as its members.
> Do you want the arguments of LAhE to always be sets, or do you > want it to be irrelevant what gadri is inside other than > the o/e/a distinction? In one sense, there would be no other gadri but lo'i/le'i/la'i, except as abbreviations. But that doesn't really answer your question. I suppose my current answer is that whatever the answer, it needs to be consistent with reducing non-set gadri to LAhE+set gadri.
I don't see you can make these compatible: 1- lu'o lo'i broda = loi broda 2- lu'o ro lo broda = loi broda 3- lu'o da poi selcmi be ro broda = loi broda 2 and 3 are incompatible. I want 2. You want 1 and 3. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________MSN 8 limited-time offer: Join now and get 3 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU= http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_newmsn8ishere_3mf