[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Invent Yourself scripsit:
> > "ka mi xunre" is precisely the same as "du'u mi xunre", because
> > there's no places for ce'u to go (it would normally be "ka mi xunre
> > ce'u" but there is no x2 for xunre).
>
> You can't trick me into defending ce'u-less ka! But this is not how it was
> interpreted the CLL, or the older generations who liked it.
As the author of CLL, I certainly had the ce'u-less ka = du'u concept in
mind, even if I didn't spell it out. I think only Bob objects to this,
and his objection is of the form "I can't be sure it's always true".
--
Said Agatha Christie / To E. Philips Oppenheim John Cowan
"Who is this Hemingway? / Who is this Proust? jcowan@hidden.email
Who is this Vladimir / Whatchamacallum, http://www.reutershealth.com
This neopostrealist / Rabble?" she groused. http://www.ccil.org/cowan
--author unknown to me; any suggestions?