[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] RE: [lojban] djedi li integer



On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Jorge Llambias wrote:

>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> >It reminds me of a "proof" I saw in high school that delivered 0 = 1.
>
> The usual way of proving 0 = 1 is dividing by zero. But mine is
> a valid proof. Which step do you have trouble with? Are the
> trailing 9's of 21.99999... different than those of 219.99999... ?
>
> >We can do Jorge's stunt more easily:
> >   x = 0.9bar
> >   1 - x = 0.00 (...infinitude of zeros...) 001
> >   = 0.0 {by handwaving}
>
> I assure you it is not a stunt. That "001" you have put at the
> end is just crazy, there is no such "last digit" in 1-x.



Are you sure it's not "there" after an infinite number of zeros?

I suppose that if we assume that 1/3 = 0.3bar, then it follows that 3/3 =
1 = 0.9bar.




-- 
Henry McCullers, an affable Plano, TX-area anti-Semite, praised the
Jewish people Monday for doing "a bang-up job" running the media.
"This has been such a great year for movies, and the new crop of fall
TV shows looks to be one of the best in years," McCullers said.
"And the cable news channels are doing a terrific job, too. Admittedly,
they're not reporting on the Jewish stranglehold on world finance,
but, hey, that's understandable."