[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> > Your XS ignores Collectives, treating them as identical to pluralities.
>
> In XS:
>
> le ci broda: "the three broda", the group, one entity.
>
> ro le ci broda: "Each of the three broda", each member of the group,
> three entities.
>
> What do you understand by "plurality"?
Dr. Rosta's XS gives: {ci lo re plise} = "three pairs of apples"
Is it really referring to apple-collectives? I don't think that apples can
form collectives. But how else would one discuss three pairs? This is the
conflation of plurality and collective.
I think we agree on our definitions, but mine are here:
http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/Towards%20a%20complete%20gadri%20picture
--
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...