[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la and cusku di'e
But as things stand, the x2 of me fails to export to the prenex in an ordinary way, & I'm confident we would find logical problems aplenty with that.
But {me} doesn't have an x2. {me <sumti>} is a one place brivla
and it is proper that the quantifier fail to export. Indeed it might
make sense to say that {me} anihilates the quantifier turning
<sumti> into a type of which {me} selects an instance. (You
explained {me} as something like that at some point.)
FWIW, for me, {me} means "x1 has the property of x2hood",
Would that be: ko'a me ko'e = ko'a ckaci le ka tu'o ko'e zo'u ce'u du ko'e That keeps any quantifier of ko'e out of the picture. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp