[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Lojbab: > Somehow this discussion has ventured into the territory discussed in the > TLI resconsideration of subjunctives, which proposed just such a predicate > as And suggests > > http://www.loglan.org/Articles/mia-subjunctives.html > > This suggests that da'i can handle it, because so far as I can recall, pc > and Cowan reviewed that article and opined that we had the whole thing > well-covered I doubt it. As overample discussion has established, SL doesn't have subjunctivity well-covered, except in the trivial sense that it could define brivla to express whatever meanings are involved in subjunctivity. --And.