[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] ti (was: RE: kau



And Rosta scripsit:

> The uncertainty over writing would be whether the speaker is
> pointing to something in their environment while writing (which 
> would be weird, because the reader can't see it) or pointing to 
> something on the page (less weird -- e.g. {ti pixra lo'e mi mamta} 
> as a caption).

It was the former interpretation that I wished to deflate in CLL, not the
latter one (which had not occurred to me at the time).

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@hidden.email  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.