[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la and cusku di'e
> I1. {LAhE lo'i broda} = {LAhE ro lo broda}
>
> I2. {LAhE lo'i broda} = {LAhE le selcmi be ro broda}
The right one is whichever allows for gadri to be paraphrased as
LAhE+lo'i/le'i/la'i. I'm not sure which that is.
Do you want {lu'i lo'i broda} = {lo'i broda}?
Do you want the arguments of LAhE to always be sets, or do you
want it to be irrelevant what gadri is inside other than
the o/e/a distinction?
In other words, I understand you want for example
{loi broda} = {lu'o lo'i broda}, but what meaning do
you give to {lu'o ro lo broda}, if any?
> Anyway, I don't see how A could be a problem if LAhEs > work as in (I2) For example, if the anaphor refers to a set, the question arises whether LAhE ought to apply to the referent of the anaphor.
I think it should apply in the same way as with a regular set, but we seem to disagree as to how that is. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 3 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU= http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_eliminateviruses_3mf