[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] more on shortening romu'ei stuff



Hasty reply. Cumki is epistemic modality, whereas "can, capable" seem 
to have to do with root modality of a general kind (rather that the
more specific "may, permitted", which is deontic modality, taken, iirc,
to be a subtype of root). Perhaps, then, kakne is likewise supposed
to express root modality. You can probably find a lot of stuff on this
by googling for "root modality", "types modality epistemic root", etc.)


--And
>>> jjllambias@hidden.email 11/28/02 02:21pm >>>

la djorden cusku di'e

>I can give you a distinction between kakne and cumki:
>	cumki fa lenu mi zatfa'i la barda jamfu
>	kakne lenu mi zatfa'i la barda jamfu
>The first is true, the latter false.

Could you elaborate? How can it be possible that you find
him if he is not capable of being found? Is it because
with {kakne} the event has to be somehow up to you, or
up to Big Foot, and neither of you is up to it, whereas
with {cumki} it is left up to chance? The only thing
{kakne} seems to add is that it can select one of the
participants in the relationship and somehow peg the
possibility to it. But {ka'e} can't do that.

>I think anything which is
>true for kakne is true for cumki, but not the other way around.

That may very well be the case, but the difference as far
as I can see can only come from the fact that something
which is cumki may be not related by kakne to any of its
participants. But {ka'e} does not access any participant
the way {kakne} does.

>I
>would think cumki corresponds to one kind of su'omu'ei, and kakne
>to another kind of su'omu'ei (similarly, nibli corresponds to one
>kind of romu'ei, and nitcu or bilga correspond to another kind of
>romu'ei).

Well, {nitcu} and {bilga} raise the same issues as {kakne},
they involve some participant in particular, something that
{romu'ei} cannot do.

I can see the paraphrases:

broda su'omu'ei ko'a <--> le nu broda cu cumki ko'a
broda romu'ei ko'a <--> le nu broda cu sarcu ko'a

even though they are probably not strict equivalences.
But kakne/nitcu/bilga involve something else rather
different.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus 


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
jboske-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/