[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Just to be sure



xorxes:
>    lo broda be ro brode
> 
> is 
> 
>    su'o da poi ro de zo'u da broda de
> 
> right?
> 
> In other words, a quantifier in a be-complement does not
> export to the prenex of the main bridi, but only to the 
> prenex of the subordinated clause. I think this is obvious,
> but I just want to make sure everyone agrees.

ye-es, but the subordinate clause is a syntactic artefact.
{lo broda cu brode} can rewrite as {da ge broda gi broda}.
Hence {lo broda be ro brode cu brodo} should rewrite as
{da ge broda be ro brode gi brodo} (with ro within scope of
ge).

--And.