[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > To summarize: > * We *do* need Unique. I agree that we need Unique. I think this term is misleading but I can't see any better term, and the Loglan Project is notorious for abusing English terms so I don't see why this should be an exception. If I recall, though, this whole mess was started when we tried to discern the characteristics of the Unique. We were being confused at first with the Three Averages and so forth, but now those distractions have been eliminated. What do we know yet about the relationship between the Unique and its Avatars? I do not think that Unique glosses as "typical", so be aware that we are breaking from the CLL. -- // if (!terrorist) // ignore (); // else collect_data ();