[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] fundamentalism as fundamental (RE: Re: gadri paradigm: 2 excellent proposals



Lojbab:
> At 12:33 PM 12/24/02 +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> >So I want the impossible: both formalism and fundamentalism. Yes, I
> >do want the impossible. It's either that or schism. pc, Jordan, and
> >you have all raised the prospect. If I accede to it by not seeking
> >out compromise, I betray the community. I shall not preside over
> >schism 
> 
> I can agree with virtually everything you've said in the past couple of 
> days, but the last sentence you stole from my mouth %^)
> 
> > >Nor do I want to thwart Naturalists or those like Lojbab who want
> > >to see *a* loglan come to life, regardless of its merits from a
> > >formalist perspective. So like you I am very unsure about how to
> > >proceed 
> >
> >I can't give either you or Bob everything you want 
> 
> But you are!

No, I want not only a language that can express what I want to
express, but also one where the cost of expressing it (measured
in longwindedness) does not outweigh the benefit (measured in
terms of how closely what I say matches what I mean). And I
don't want to wait 50 years for it.

--And.