[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
At 02:49 PM 10/15/03 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Arnt Richard Johansen scripsit: > Doesn't this entail monogamy, or at least a dyadic relation? Monogamy, no; a dyadic relation, yes. However, there is nothing to prevent you from creating a lujvo with the place structure x1 belongs to marriage group x2.
Back in the day when such things weren't controversial, one would say da speni de joi di (and for that matter da speni de .e di); I'll leave it to the jboskeists whether these mean something totally other than "what lojbab had in mind")
lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@hidden.email Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org