[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar



On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@hidden.email> wrote:
> Am 08.10.2012 18:05, schrieb Jorge Llambías:
> >
> > "y" is [j] (and I think Mike proposed it could also be [y] in lujvo).
> > We only defined a few interjections with w-, but I mentioned that I
> > would probably like to add some with y- too.
>
> Oh, okay. A shame that there are so few letters in the latin alphabet.
> :) I would prefer if every letter had just one pronunciation, but there
> aren't any letters left if you don't introduce diacritics.

[j] and [y] would be allophones in Xorban.

> Maybe a
> hyphen can replace the stem-internal <y> thus: "bcd-fgj". But in speech,
> there is no difference between that and "bcdfgj" (if you happen to
> insert a schwa in the middle), and you can insert schwa anywhere anyway,
> so is this compound hyphen really necessary?

The schwa [@] is different from [y] (German ü).

> Not a very urgent issue
> though.
> For what it's worth, I'd like to have the y- interjections.

So would I. They are not inconsistent with the use of y in lujvo.

co ma'a xrxe