[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar



Pity.  The second makes some sense, though painfully;the first none at all.  From what & says, I gather that the omission is meant to be corrected.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:32 AM, "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:

 

The official grammar doesn't bar "sa bbbe ccci", nor does it bar "sa bbba la ccca ra ddda ggga", so any rule that (arguably reasonably) excludes these formulas would not be a mere reformulation of Xorban, but rather a novel formulation representing a subset of Xorban as we have it.