[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@hidden.email> > wrote: >> >> In selma'o notation, this would become: >> >> sentence := formula | CA formula | WA >> formula := CCA | term formula | foretree formula | formula aftertree >> aftertree := HI | term aftertree | JA aftertree aftertree >> foretree := HE | term foretree | JA foretree foretree >> term := NA | LA formula | JA formula > > Eight parts of speech so far isn't too bad. As a side note, I'll quickly > mention here three things about trees I've discovered so far that the > speaker will have to remain aware of: I'm not too happy with all that, since it is now not apparent from the production "term formula" whether the term has scope over the full formula or not. I think he/hi need more work. co ma'a xrxe