Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar

selpa'i, On 08/10/2012 16:02:

"la qqa" could probably be shortened to "la qa" I think.


No, "la qa" contains an incomplete stem qa... that continues until it hits the next q.

--And.

References:
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: "John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: selpa'i <seladwa@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@hidden.email>
- Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar
  - From: selpa'i <seladwa@hidden.email>