[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote: > Jorge Llambías, On 06/09/2012 01:40: > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:47 PM, And Rosta<and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote: > >> > >> if there is some convention that vV coerces a kind of comparative > >> interpretation of predicates cobound with it. > > > > So vV is basically "rather" or "rather than not". > > Probably, yes. I'm now wondering whether vV shouldn't be just "ne". Does the V play any relevant role? ma'a xrxe