On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:56 PM, John E Clifford
<kali9putra@hidden.email> wrote:
Do you really want even secondary restrictions on universals to be non-veridical?
Respectfully, I named my examples s1, s2, s3, r1, r2, r3 for a reason -- assuming one of those is what you're on about. Please keep in mind that it's not always easily identifiable what you are referring to when you respond to a long email with a top-posted one-liner.