[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote: > > I meant it was analogous to "ne" in that it binds a variable within its > complement and returns a monadic predicate. "la no je xkra xrma mrsa", > "Black Horse is dead". Right, but that's equivalent to "le no je xkra xrma mrse". The "a" inside no has nothing to do with the vowel of "la": la nnla le nxle li no ce na tlmrje'eka'a dndakike "The boy gave the girl the forget-me-not." But now I have to allow illocutionaries be inside the scope of operators... mu'o mi'e xorxes