[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Mike S., On 27/08/2012 00:44:
I just wrote a long post on this. http://xorban.wordpress.com/2012/08/26/the-semantics-of-ju/
Doubtless I'm being obtuse (and maybe have overlooked certain crucial elements of previous discussion), but if ju has two arguments, why doesn't it just merge the eventifications of each argument into one? In other words, it would be equivalent to an eventification of je. (Indeed, why have {ju} at all? Why not just {jefa}?)
--And.