[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:34:54 +0200, Isaac Penzev <isaacp@hidden.email> wrote:
Yes, yes. Romance langs have two or three strata (layers) in their vocabulary: 1) derived directly from VL and thus subject to all phoneticchanges; 2) early Latinisms that experienced mutations in limited way depending on the time of borrowing; 3) later "bookish" Latinisms, that could, btw, substitute already existing "vulgar" words, e.g. It. _gloria_ < L. =, while Old It. > _groglia_ or _grora_.
Don't forget 4) words borrowed from other Romance languages, like Sp. _paï¿œs_ "country" (= Fr. _pays_).
*Muke! -- http://frath.net/ E jer savne zarjᅵ mas ne http://kohath.livejournal.com/ Se imnᅵ koone'f metha http://kohath.deviantart.com/ Brissve mᅵ kolᅵ adᅵ.