[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
En réponse à Christian Thalmann :
Right. Stupid me. ;-)
LOL.
I think I'm just going to use the singular indefinite article for uncountables. Thus "the taste of wine" would become |is sappur nys uenun| [i 'sapp@r nyz 'y@n@]. The danger of misunderstanding is very low, methinks.
Indeed.
If we were talking about a specific wine, we could use the definite article and treat the wine as countable (since specific brands or generations of wine are countable): |is sappur ys uenun| "the taste of the wine".
Looks OK to me :) .
> > In Narbonósc, there is a partitive article of the form "ne/na" (which > exists only in the singular). It is derived from "em+e" and "em+a" (like > "du" is "de+le"). Pretty cool.
Thanks! :))) Christophe Grandsire. http://rainbow.conlang.free.frYou need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.