[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:I had proposed the same thing in a previous discussion with And, but
>
> If we wished to use this, I would reorder the argument places of "ckj" and allow it to take a variable number of arguments.
reducing it to ck-, which covers both "ckaji" and "ckini" (and all the
rest that Lojban doesn't have).
> I also think "bridi" can also be absorbed; that would be just a fV ckj-, would it not?I think with "bridi" the speaker is not actually claiming that the x1
of bridi is true, just that it is a proposition with such and such as
selbri and such and such as arguments. So I don't think bridi is
equivalent to ckaji/jetnu/fasnu.
co ma'a xrxe