[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Am 09.10.2012 02:09, schrieb Mike S.:
> I created a binary version of the syntax based on how I prefer to viewLooks promising, though I haven't yet checked every rule. I do notice
> the grammar here: http://loglang.wordpress.com/xorban/grammar/
that these syntactical phrases don't sound very traditional, but maybe
that is to be expected from an engelang.
> In my grammar that's been renamed a term, but it amounts to the sameYes, I agree. It felt odd to join two formulae for no reason, and the
> thing. I do think that it's very helpful to view {binary operator +
> first complement} as a meaningful constituent that behaves in a manner
> similar to a unary operator. It's a construction that has a fair number
> of reasonably close analogs in natural languages: objects/sumti,
> adjectives, adverbs, case tags. Two formulas in a row doesn't really
> have any constituent-like analog in natural languages.
other direction is much more natural. I literally threw that tree
together in a few minutes just to hint at what I had in mind. Good.
This seems to be going somewhere.
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i