[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] Boy and Girl in Romance Languages



Side question: how/why did classical /ue/ become a falling diphthong?
AFAIK, where uV diphthongs are preserved in natural romlangs they're
all rising...


On 10/22/07, Christian Thalmann <cinga@hidden.email> wrote:
> --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "Scotto Hlad" <scott.hlad@...> wrote:
> >
> > Regimonti's vocabulary is linked much closer to "classical" Latin.
>
> [unlurk]
>
> Boy and girl being such common words, Jovian has strayed a bit
> from its otherwise rather faithful adherence to its classical
> roots.
>
> The standard word for boy is puobe [pu@b] < PUBES + Gmc "Bub",
> with the archaic puore [pu@r] surviving only in Church songs
> and the like.
>
> The commonly used word for girl is maedel ['majd@l] < Gmc
> "Mädel", which is not exclusively applied to children, though.
> In informal usage, it can refer to females throughout the
> sexual age as well, just like English "girl".  Unlike puore,
> the word puela [py@l] is still in active use today and refers
> to female children exclusively.
>
> [relurk]
>
>
> -- Christian Thalmann
>
>


-- 
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@hidden.email>