[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jorge Llamb�as, On 03/10/2012 02:03:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:54 PM, And Rosta<and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote:But on reflection it might be better to say that it is Qa that (syntactically) binds va, and that Qa [... va ...] bcda predicates bcd of {[... ni ...], [... nu ...]}.Would you also be happy with the reverse situation, with va appearing in the predication rather than the restriction: la prfraka'a je va ldra ckfa "My preference is for milky (as opposed to whether-or-not milky) coffee."
Yes. --And.