[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jorge Llamb�as, On 25/08/2012 22:47:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, And Rosta<and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote:Jorge Llamb�as, On 25/08/2012 21:56:On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:13 PM, And Rosta<and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote:Jorge Llamb�as, On 25/08/2012 01:04:Hmm... OK, then I guess this makes the syntactic rules simpler, but the rules for when it's appropriate to use an illocutionary operator somewhat more complicated.What are examples of complications? Why not just put illocutionaries in the class of predicates?Is it meaningful, for example, to negate such a predicate? The grammar allows any predicate to be negated, but I'm not sure what it would mean to say "I don't hereby command you to do so and so"? Or "I hereby could command you to do so and so".Good point! Can we appeal to pragmatics?That's what I meant by complicating the rules for when it's appropriate to use it. :)
We want rules of grammar, not rules of appropriate usage... But it is worrying if grammatical sentences can yield meanings that are not merely surreal but rather are complete unintelligible gibberish.
I think "Is it lunchtime yet, because I'm getting hungry" could be analysed as two statements: (1) I hereby ask whether it is lunchtime yet. (2) I hereby assert that the reason I ask whether it is lunchtime yet is because I'm getting hungry. We mangle both into one utterance so as to not have to repeat the portion that is common to both statements, but logically they don't really belong in the same statement if I'm right that only one illocutionary force per statement is allowed.How about "hello again"? That doesn't seem to me to involve an illocutionary assertion in addition to an illocutionary salutation.I would say that would be a single statement: "I hereby express greetings to you again", "I hereby re-express greetings to you". I don't think the illocutionary there needs to be within the scope of again.
And likewise "byebye for now" = "I hereby (bid you byebye for now)". OK.--And.