[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] VL Poter

On 7/11/07, Peter Collier <petecollier@hidden.email> wrote:

There were still some cases left in VL, t


Of course, nouns that existed in CL were still declined to some extent
in VL.  What I meant was that words that hadn't existed in CL as nouns
but sprang into existence in VL were often indeclinable.

--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@hidden.email>