[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: [romconlang] VL Poter

• From: "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@hidden.email>
• Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:29:43 -0400
• Subject: Re: [romconlang] VL Poter
• To: romconlang@yahoogroups.com

I don't know, but as a VL addition it was likely indeclinable, yes?



On 7/11/07, Peter Collier <petecollier@hidden.email> wrote:
>
>   Anyone know how the VL noun "POTER" (power) delclined? Perhaps like
> PATER, i.e. 3rd declension?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@hidden.email>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [romconlang] VL Poter
    • From: "Peter Collier" <petecollier@hidden.email>

• References:
  • VL Poter
    • From: "Peter Collier" <petecollier@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: VL Poter
• Next by Date: Re: [romconlang] VL Poter
• Previous by thread: VL Poter
• Next by thread: Re: [romconlang] VL Poter
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread