[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] VL Poter

There were still some cases left in VL, there must have been, as two (?) survived into old French, no? Very much reduced declensions though I'm sure.
I'm trying to fit a square peg into a round hole really - trying to determine how to decline it my conlang by imagining how it was/might have been declined in Latin. For the moment I've actually gone for something closer to the second decl (like PVER)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@hidden.email> 
To: <romconlang@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [romconlang] VL Poter



I don't know, but as a VL addition it was likely indeclinable, yes?



On 7/11/07, Peter Collier <petecollier@hidden.email> wrote:


  Anyone know how the VL noun "POTER" (power) delclined? Perhaps like
PATER, i.e. 3rd declension?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]