[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- Jacques Deh�e <jacquesdehe@hidden.email> wrote:
>
> Inter-romance es un lingua construite, dunque
> non native.
Perhaps I misled: the conlang in question is
"native" to this region of groups -- Romconlang,
Conculture, Conlang, Celticonlang.
> Inter-romance es diferente d'Interlingua, es
> plus moderne,
> ma vu es incompetente pro vider le diferentias.
It's easy to understand for anyone at all who has
had some Latin and some Spanish. Throw in a
little bit of French or Italian and Bob's your
uncle. To be quite honest with you, while I find
I-R very understandable, you are reinventing the
wheel. This is what auxlanging is all about, and
what it's always been about!
> Inter-romance non pretende devenir un lingua
> auxiliar mundial.
Perhaps not. However, the superiority complex
you've displayed is quite in keeping with the
usual demeanour of auxlangers.
> Inter-romance permite me de ser comprendite per
> occidental personas,
> regretabilemente anque per fanaticos
> hiper-agresive.
>
> Al contrario vu besonia usar l'inglese pro ser
> comprendite.
Indeed. It's called "using the interlanguage
common to this group". You are undoubetly
ignorant of the fact that we are an international
group. The fact remains that English is the
interlanguage par excellence hereabouts. We're
not afraid to use our conlangs here and are not
miffed by yours.
Once again, since you seem to missed the whole
point: we are not interested in your language as
a means of world or regional communications.
There are already very fine and well established
languages that get that job done (though I know
you aspire to auxlangy greatness!). We're
interested in your language in so far as it's a
constructed Romance language.
> Comprehensibilita d'Inter-romance es su
> apertura, su sanita e su honesta.
We don't really care much about its
comprehensability, Jacques. We're not auxlangers.
You've nothing to prove here!
Padraic
>
> Cordialmente, Jacques
>
> *
>
>
> --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Padraic
> Brown <elemtilas@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- Jacques Deh�e <jacquesdehe@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Un lingua incomprehensibile non pote
> pretender
> > > ser inspirate per le Latino !
> >
> > Oi coul�! Fas ridieir a lis chraves!!
> >
> > (Thank you very much! I wasn't expecting such
> > high praise!!)
> >
> > > Cordialmente, Jacques
> >
> > Listen Jocko, before you make a further arse
> of
> > thyself hereabouts, please do your homework.
> >
> > One, this is not Auxlang, but Romconlang.
> Here,
> > we are almost entirely artistic conlangers.
> We
> > tolerate your auxlang in so far as it is also
> a
> > Romance conlang and you seem genuinely
> interested
> > in discussing Romance conlangs. Your typical
> > "your language sucks and one day my auxlang
> will
> > rule the world" attitude is not appreciated
> > around here.
> >
> > Two, it takes more than a copy-n-paste from
> the
> > work of Gode et al to make a "comfortable"
> > Romance language. It might make for a decent
> > auxlang, but you're obviously out of your
> depth
> > here, as we don't generally go in for
> simplistic
> > planned languages and the horrific politics
> they
> > engender.
> >
> > Now, you made the comment that it is fun to
> talk
> > about what makes for a comfy _Romance_
> language.
> > You were given a response in a native Romance
> > conlang. Let's hear something substantive
> please,
> > rather than mere dismissal. We've been very
> > tolerant and interested in your conlang
> without
> > resorting to dismissal. The same sort of
> courtesy
> > will be appreciated in future.
> >
> > Padraic
> >
> > >
> > > *
> > >
> > > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Henrik
> > > Theiling <theiling@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Jacques Deh�e writes:
> > > > > I mean a successful romance conlang,
> not a
> > > cryptogram !
> > > >
> > > > Ko�?? ��ur lyng t�g er ��tt � latinn er
> bonn
> > > syskur pr� n�r
> > > > �eklyngar!
> > > >
> > > > What?? Every language which is created
> from
> > > Latin is a good
> > > success
> > > > for us conlangers!
> > > >
> > > > **Henrik
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios
> asteros; tamenio
> > vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem
> emduriase!
> > --Pomperios Perfurios.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Ill Bethisad --
> > <http://www.bethisad.com>
> >
> >
> > Come visit The World! --
> > <http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
>
Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios asteros; tamenio
vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem emduriase!
--Pomperios Perfurios.
--
Ill Bethisad --
<http://www.bethisad.com>
Come visit The World! --
<http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/>
.