[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Inter-romance es un lingua construite, dunque non native. Inter-romance es diferente d'Interlingua, es plus moderne, ma vu es incompetente pro vider le diferentias. Inter-romance non pretende devenir un lingua auxiliar mundial. Inter-romance permite me de ser comprendite per occidental personas, regretabilemente anque per fanaticos hiper-agresive. Al contrario vu besonia usar l'inglese pro ser comprendite. Comprehensibilita d'Inter-romance es su apertura, su sanita e su honesta. Cordialmente, Jacques * --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Padraic Brown <elemtilas@...> wrote: > > --- Jacques Dehée <jacquesdehe@...> wrote: > > > Un lingua incomprehensibile non pote pretender > > ser inspirate per le Latino ! > > Oi couló! Fas ridieir a lis chraves!! > > (Thank you very much! I wasn't expecting such > high praise!!) > > > Cordialmente, Jacques > > Listen Jocko, before you make a further arse of > thyself hereabouts, please do your homework. > > One, this is not Auxlang, but Romconlang. Here, > we are almost entirely artistic conlangers. We > tolerate your auxlang in so far as it is also a > Romance conlang and you seem genuinely interested > in discussing Romance conlangs. Your typical > "your language sucks and one day my auxlang will > rule the world" attitude is not appreciated > around here. > > Two, it takes more than a copy-n-paste from the > work of Gode et al to make a "comfortable" > Romance language. It might make for a decent > auxlang, but you're obviously out of your depth > here, as we don't generally go in for simplistic > planned languages and the horrific politics they > engender. > > Now, you made the comment that it is fun to talk > about what makes for a comfy _Romance_ language. > You were given a response in a native Romance > conlang. Let's hear something substantive please, > rather than mere dismissal. We've been very > tolerant and interested in your conlang without > resorting to dismissal. The same sort of courtesy > will be appreciated in future. > > Padraic > > > > > * > > > > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Henrik > > Theiling <theiling@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Jacques Dehée writes: > > > > I mean a successful romance conlang, not a > > cryptogram ! > > > > > > Koð?? Öður lyng tög er þátt á latinn er bonn > > syskur pró nær > > > þeklyngar! > > > > > > What?? Every language which is created from > > Latin is a good > > success > > > for us conlangers! > > > > > > **Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios asteros; tamenio > vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem emduriase! > --Pomperios Perfurios. > > -- > > Ill Bethisad -- > <http://www.bethisad.com> > > > Come visit The World! -- > <http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/> > > > > > > > > . >