[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Un lingua, anque un conlingua, es un medio de comunication, non un monologo autistic. Factores de confort son objective: facilita de memorisation, adaptation al claviero (keyboard) con absentia de signos diacritic, etc. Le resultato es un lingua pure et es Arte. Arte es harmonia e non es autismo, hiper-agresivita et insultas. Cordialmente, Jacques * --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Padraic Brown <elemtilas@...> wrote: > > --- Jacques Dehée <jacquesdehe@...> wrote: > > > > > Inter-romance es un lingua construite, dunque > > non native. > > Perhaps I misled: the conlang in question is > "native" to this region of groups -- Romconlang, > Conculture, Conlang, Celticonlang. > > > Inter-romance es diferente d'Interlingua, es > > plus moderne, > > ma vu es incompetente pro vider le diferentias. > > It's easy to understand for anyone at all who has > had some Latin and some Spanish. Throw in a > little bit of French or Italian and Bob's your > uncle. To be quite honest with you, while I find > I-R very understandable, you are reinventing the > wheel. This is what auxlanging is all about, and > what it's always been about! > > > Inter-romance non pretende devenir un lingua > > auxiliar mundial. > > Perhaps not. However, the superiority complex > you've displayed is quite in keeping with the > usual demeanour of auxlangers. > > > Inter-romance permite me de ser comprendite per > > occidental personas, > > regretabilemente anque per fanaticos > > hiper-agresive. > > > > Al contrario vu besonia usar l'inglese pro ser > > comprendite. > > Indeed. It's called "using the interlanguage > common to this group". You are undoubetly > ignorant of the fact that we are an international > group. The fact remains that English is the > interlanguage par excellence hereabouts. We're > not afraid to use our conlangs here and are not > miffed by yours. > > Once again, since you seem to missed the whole > point: we are not interested in your language as > a means of world or regional communications. > There are already very fine and well established > languages that get that job done (though I know > you aspire to auxlangy greatness!). We're > interested in your language in so far as it's a > constructed Romance language. > > > Comprehensibilita d'Inter-romance es su > > apertura, su sanita e su honesta. > > We don't really care much about its > comprehensability, Jacques. We're not auxlangers. > You've nothing to prove here! > > Padraic > > > > > Cordialmente, Jacques > > > > * > > > > > > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Padraic > > Brown <elemtilas@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- Jacques Dehée <jacquesdehe@> wrote: > > > > > > > Un lingua incomprehensibile non pote > > pretender > > > > ser inspirate per le Latino ! > > > > > > Oi couló! Fas ridieir a lis chraves!! > > > > > > (Thank you very much! I wasn't expecting such > > > high praise!!) > > > > > > > Cordialmente, Jacques > > > > > > Listen Jocko, before you make a further arse > > of > > > thyself hereabouts, please do your homework. > > > > > > One, this is not Auxlang, but Romconlang. > > Here, > > > we are almost entirely artistic conlangers. > > We > > > tolerate your auxlang in so far as it is also > > a > > > Romance conlang and you seem genuinely > > interested > > > in discussing Romance conlangs. Your typical > > > "your language sucks and one day my auxlang > > will > > > rule the world" attitude is not appreciated > > > around here. > > > > > > Two, it takes more than a copy-n-paste from > > the > > > work of Gode et al to make a "comfortable" > > > Romance language. It might make for a decent > > > auxlang, but you're obviously out of your > > depth > > > here, as we don't generally go in for > > simplistic > > > planned languages and the horrific politics > > they > > > engender. > > > > > > Now, you made the comment that it is fun to > > talk > > > about what makes for a comfy _Romance_ > > language. > > > You were given a response in a native Romance > > > conlang. Let's hear something substantive > > please, > > > rather than mere dismissal. We've been very > > > tolerant and interested in your conlang > > without > > > resorting to dismissal. The same sort of > > courtesy > > > will be appreciated in future. > > > > > > Padraic > > > > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Henrik > > > > Theiling <theiling@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > Jacques Dehée writes: > > > > > > I mean a successful romance conlang, > > not a > > > > cryptogram ! > > > > > > > > > > Koð?? Öður lyng tög er þátt á latinn er > > bonn > > > > syskur pró nær > > > > > þeklyngar! > > > > > > > > > > What?? Every language which is created > > from > > > > Latin is a good > > > > success > > > > > for us conlangers! > > > > > > > > > > **Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios > > asteros; tamenio > > > vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem > > emduriase! > > > --Pomperios Perfurios. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Ill Bethisad -- > > > <http://www.bethisad.com> > > > > > > > > > Come visit The World! -- > > > <http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios asteros; tamenio > vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem emduriase! > --Pomperios Perfurios. > > -- > > Ill Bethisad -- > <http://www.bethisad.com> > > > Come visit The World! -- > <http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/> > > > > > > > > . >