[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
I mean a successful romance conlang, not a cryptogram ! Cheers, Jacques * --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Padraic Brown <elemtilas@...> wrote: > > --- Jacques Dehée <jacquesdehe@...> wrote: > > > il es interesante d'elaborar un lingua > > construite confortabile pro usatores de > > cultura romance > > Gouerement! Goueldreus ty amplificar poz c' alch > cante Roman? ays ces chantes vult, hos-ci. foreth > il c' ist o c' acel cants il ma o menus > conforteible. > > Dom-placereus ar-z-other alch ke crezes ty > ynteresant, ystrang o mer niconforteible di 's > nusteor chantes! > > Padraic > > PS > > (Yes, it is, indeed. Would you care to elaborate > on a comfortable Romance conlang? There's a lot > of them out there, some more or less comfortable. > > I'd be interested in hearing what you find > interesting or even uncomfortable about the > various Romance conlangs that get discussed > here.) > > > Camifi, Marusi, teterani, tester fuferios asteros; tamenio > vem Persaecion empuriase ed ec pasem emduriase! > --Pomperios Perfurios. > > -- > > Ill Bethisad -- > <http://www.bethisad.com> > > > Come visit The World! -- > <http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/> > > > > > > > > . >