[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jacques Deh�e skrev:
I mean a successful romance conlang, not a cryptogram ! Cheers, Jacques
May sutxes nones el medeis paull <<linguist ausciliar>> ed el <<artist lingu�stec>>! No crair che ancaure une lenghe cinstrutxe ausciliar -- enquant txi son melt! -- poudet escaulir algun bisegn che il gint rom� puoden tiendre a comunichiar entre se. Sutxes paur me es estxitiar el sens est�tec de mestes ed eltre artist lingu�stic, che es almen un scop atenaul! Jo no affront ausciliarist paur doniar nem mel a seu criac��. Sen� nau entresset restuam en silen� e las�uam li fiar su� cause sen� judi� de valaur. /Bendetx But success is not the same for the auxlanger and the artlanger! I don't think that another constructed auxlang -- of which there are many! -- can satisfy any need which the Roman peoples may have to communicate with each other. Success for me is to excite the aesthetic sense of myself and other artlangers, which is at least an attainable goal! I don't affront auxlangers by giving their creations bad names. If I'm not interested I rest in silence and let them do their thing without value judgements. /Benct