[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory H. Bontrager" <GregBont@e...> wrote: > > I am just now becoming aware of how distinct Vulgar Latin and > Classical Latin probably were, and this has made me curious about > something. Since all Romance natlangs are based on Vulgar Latin, > are there any Romance conlangs that are based on Classical Latin? Rubaga, but I haven't worked on it much. Jeff