[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "jsjonesmiami" <jsjonesmiami@y...> wrote: > > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "Gregory H. Bontrager" > <GregBont@e...> wrote: > > > > I am just now becoming aware of how distinct Vulgar Latin and > > Classical Latin probably were, and this has made me curious about > > something. Since all Romance natlangs are based on Vulgar Latin, > > are there any Romance conlangs that are based on Classical Latin? > > Rubaga, but I haven't worked on it much. > > Jeff Fortunatian/Uchunata has a Classical Latin base, although the changes and numerous substrates often conceal it. Uchunata xorb fyssex huaun do crasca chin, pancy fsax mutatiaunex ot myrtax sypchatax xef xorn ratat fsa.