[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

New Lang: Verbs



Before I get sidetracked again, here are the verb paradigms and some 
of the problems I have with them.

Comments welcome!

Current Major Verb Paradigms

Purely orthographic changes are ignored here.
The PretInd, PastSub, and Past.Part. sometimes follow a different
paradigm. For example, venir, veni (PretInd 1PS), venud.
There are a bunch of other special cases, like |i| becoming |j| 
between vowels.

0-  basic stem
1-  possible stem change due to stress
2-  possible stem change due to either palatalization OR non-front
    vowel
3-  combination of 1 and 2
4-  finite past stem

Infin: 0-ar,  Gerund: 0-and,  Pres.Part: 0-ant,  Past.Part: 0-ad
PrsInd  PrsSub  ImprfInd  PretInd  PastSub
1-e     1-i     0-ave     0-ai     0-assi
1-as    1-es    0-avas    0-ast    0-asses
1-a     1-      0-ava     0-au     0-ass
0-aons  0-ions  0-avaons  0-âmes   0-assions
0-adz   0-edz   0-avadz   0-astes  0-assedz
1-an    1-en    0-avan    0-aron   0-assen
Imperative: 0-a, 0-ad;  Example: amar

(labels will be omitted for the rest)

0-er,  0-iand,  0-iant,  0-ud
3-i     3-e     0-eve     0-ui     0-ussi
1-es    3-as    0-evas    0-ust    0-usses
1-      3-a     0-eva     0-û      0-uss
0-ions  2-aons  0-evaons  0-ûmes   0-ussions
0-edz   2-adz   0-evadz   0-ustes  0-ussedz
1-en    3-an    0-evan    0-uron   0-ussen
1-, 0-éd;  Example: tener

0-r,  0-iand,  0-iant,  1-t
3-i    3-e     2-eve     4-i      4-essi
1-s    3-as    2-evas    4-est    4-esses
1-     3-a     2-eva     4-       4-ess
1-mes  2-aons  2-evaons  4-ons    4-essions
1-tes  2-adz   2-evadz   4-estes  4-essedz
3-on   3-an    2-evan    4-ron    4-essen
1-, 1-t;  Example: dîr

0-r,  0-iand,  0-iant,  1-t
3-i    3-e     2-eve     0-ei      0-iessi
1-es   3-as    2-evas    0-iest    0-iesses
1-     3-a     2-eva     0-ê       0-iess
0-ons  2-aons  2-evaons  0-êmes    0-iessions
0-edz  2-adz   2-evadz   0-iestes  0-iessedz
3-on   3-an    2-evan    0-êron    0-iessen
1-, 0-éd;  Example: vendr

0-ir,  2-end,  2-ent,  0-id
3-i     3-e     0-ive     0-î      0-issi
1-es    3-as    0-ivas    0-ist    0-isses
1-      3-a     0-iva     0-iu     0-iss
0-ions  2-aons  0-ivaons  0-îmes   0-issions
0-idz   2-adz   0-ivadz   0-istes  0-issedz
3-on    3-an    0-ivan    0-iron   0-issen
1-i, 0-id;  Example: salir

0-ir,  0-ixend,  0-ixent,  0-id
0-isqui  0-isque    0-ive     0-î      0-issi
0-ixes   0-iscas    0-ivas    0-ist    0-isses
0-ix     0-isca     0-iva     0-iu     0-iss
0-ixons  0-iscaons  0-ivaons  0-îmes   0-issions
0-ixedz  0-iscadz   0-ivadz   0-istes  0-issedz
0-iscon  0-iscan    0-ivan    0-iron   0-issen
0-ix, 0-ixéd;  Example: finir

Some things to determine:
* Exactly which changes due to palatalization can be preserved
  against analogy?
* Add circumflex to -aron, -uron, -iron?
* Forms used for "to go".
* Precise forms used for "to be". What I have is:
???,  ???,  ???,  fud?
sui    síe     ere     fui     fussi
es     sías    eras    fust    fusses
est    sía     era     fû      fuss
sons   siaons  eraons  fûmes   fussions
estes  siadz   eradz   fustes  fussedz
son    sían    eran    furon   fussen
???, ???

I should note that some of the forms given, here and in the paradigms
above, are shakier than others.

The details of the future and conditional haven't been worked out yet.
They'll be derived from Infinitive + form of aver.
* The irregular conjugation of aver hasn't been pinned down.
* Should I allow object pronouns to go between the infinitive and the
  auxiliary, like Portuguese?
* Even if I don't, I like the idea of the infinitive retaining its
  own stress, e.g.
        amar ai [V.mA:"rAi] rather than
        amarai  [V.mA"rAi].
  Can I get away with this?

There are a couple other possible tenses, but I think they'll be
obsolete in the modern language.

Jeff