[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On 11 Jun 2004, at 17:51, Muke Tever wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:37:06 +0100, Carl Edlund Anderson <cea@hidden.email>wrote:Does anyone happen to know the origin of Latin <sanguis>, <sanguin>- ("blood"). I can't find a PIE source. Is it thought to be Etruscan? Unknown? Surely its not connected with Greek <haima>?Possibly G <ear>/<e:ar>, or Hittite <ešhar, ešhnaš>, and Sanskrit <asrk,asnas>, etc., an r/n stem something like *esH2r, *esH2n- (in Pokorny, *e(:)sr(g_w), *@snes, 343.) -- the Latin word's been befunged somewhatanyway (-is, -inis doesn't seem normal for L) but it might go there, morelikely than with <haima>.
I was guessing a more archaic nominative singular than <sanguis> would simply be the stem + -s: *sanguins. That was how I was going to have it in my "alternate xeno-latin" :) though maybe I ought to go off and find another PIE root for "blood" and construct an Italic version ....
Cheers, Carl -- Carl Edlund Anderson http://www.carlaz.com/