[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] Re: Natus



Roger Mills wrote:
> Span. nacer is entirely* regular-- pret. nac�, pp. nacido
> Ital. nascere has irreg. pret. nacqui, nascesti.... and pp. nato.  Of course
> the pret. (= Lat. perfect) had to be created by analogy for this verb, since
> it was passive in Lat.
> --------------
> *except 1st sg. pres. nazco

Strange.  How often would one need to use the first person singular
*present* tense of "be born"?  :-)

-- 
"There's no such thing as 'cool'.  Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42