[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] Romance WE



--- Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@hidden.email>
wrote:
>  --- Adam Walker skrzypszy: 
> 
> > I'm currently leaning toward C-a forms nozu/-a. 
> What
> > think ye?
> 
> I agree with Christian, that -u and -a for plural
> forms seems odd. I would
> suggest nozi/-e and vozi/-e instead. 
> 


Not possible in C-a since /e/ and /i/ merged early on
in final position (as did /u/ and /o/).  'Sides that
would make "we" the only pronoun exclusivle available
in nueter gender.

I should mention that vos- is a formal form of 2nd
person.

> But to be honest, I don't see the point of
> distinguishing gender in this case.
> Even the Slavic languages, who distinguish gender
> whenever they can, don't have
> feminine personal pronouns for other persons than
> the 3rd. Polish (just to give
> an example) d�es make a different in the attached
> verbal forms, however. For
> example:
><snip Polish examples> 

<unicode alert off>
> 
> Now that you mention it, I have never been
> particularly satisfied with the
> Wenedyk 1st and 2nd persons plural, _nosz_ and
> _wosz_. I am considering
> changing them to _nu_ and _wu_, at least in the
> nominative. _nosz_ and _wosz_
> could then stay as accusatives.
> 
> Jan

Latin NOS could drop the final |s| and become |nu|
which is homophonous with |nu| meaning "no" and thus
might feel the pressur to re apply the -s to mark
plural giving |nus| which feels like a masculine
plural (and might give rise to |nas| for all-female
groups.

OR Latin NOS could add a gender marker to nos before
the |s| drops to make nosu > nozu which would then
"necessitate" noza as a female alternative like in
Spanish.

OR Latin NOS could compound with ALTERUM to give
|nozaurru\-a| as the C-a results.

OR Latin NOS could simply survive as |nos| which might
seem neutral enough not to spawn a feminine and could
retain the |s| as a precieved plural marker from the
get-go.  It would make a strange word, but not
impossible.

Adam

=====
Fached il prori ul pa�eveju mutu chu djul atexindu.
-- Carrajena proverb