[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
En réponse à Anton Sherwood <bronto@hidden.email>: > > Can't find it in my reference (which is quite thorough), > but that's not absolute proof! > Any reference that doesn't refer to the shadda (the geminate mark, which looks like a w) can be immediately thrown away... Full-vowelled Arabic cannot be written without it! :)) Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr It takes a straight mind to create a twisted conlang.