[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Mike S. scripsit: > If I might ask, is there any reason why we're not yet at GG, and is there > anything that I might be able to do to expedite our migration? I would > have liked to use the schwa symbol today, but that's mojibake fodder on YG. I had a death in the family with duties to attend to. All's well now. I've migrated about half the list members, and I'll try to do the rest tomorrow. Unfortunately, I can't migrate the archives -- you can move your personal list archive from YM to GMail, but not list archives. Still, we can cope. -- John Cowan cowan@hidden.email http://ccil.org/~cowan I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1. I doubt if the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940