[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Am 24.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Mike S.:
I don't think so. I think I picked something I liked the sound of, and it also happens to have two consonants from the word "inVoLve". I didn't know relatedness to Lojban was important. I considered tx- because of tu'a, but I'm not sure about the status of x and h at the moment. vl- is a bit easier to pronounce though, so I don't know.On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:41 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@hidden.email> wrote:
I had also proposed vl = "x1 is an event involving x2", for things like
"la ckta le vleka plkeka'a".
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
Is there a Lojban word especially related to vl-?
I'd say no, strictly speaking. The o'e might have different referents, that is, we don't know what the implicit argument(s) in "fa smo'e" are, at least in Lojban that would be the case. I'm not sure what xorban's policy is here.Also, would it be correct to say that
je ra vla fa smo'e ra fa smo'e vla
?
mu'o mi'e la selpa'i