[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: [engelang] xorban summary

• From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@hidden.email>
• Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:16:35 -0300
• Subject: Re: [engelang] xorban summary
• To: engelang@yahoogroups.com

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:01 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote:
>
> Yes it is good.
>
> The essay ends, BTW, by noting correctly that bcdo'eko'e cannot be "lo'e
> smo'e bcdo'eko'e".

I think it can be, because "lo'e smo'e" is the ultimate myopic
singularization, but I know everyone (starting with pc) will want to
throw stones at me for saying that.

pnja'ako'eko'e
"I put things on things."

co ma'a xrxe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [engelang] xorban summary
    • From: And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email>
  • Re: [engelang] xorban summary
    • From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>

• References:
  • xorban summary
    • From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email>
  • Re: [engelang] xorban summary
    • From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>
  • Re: [engelang] xorban summary
    • From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@hidden.email>
  • Re: [engelang] xorban summary
    • From: And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [engelang] phonology
• Next by Date: Re: [engelang] phonology
• Previous by thread: Re: [engelang] xorban summary
• Next by thread: Re: [engelang] xorban summary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread