[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Yes it is good. The essay ends, BTW, by noting correctly that bcdo'eko'e cannot be "lo'e smo'e bcdo'eko'e". Jorge Llamb�as, On 17/09/2012 23:16:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Mike S.<maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, John E Clifford<kali9putra@hidden.email> wrote:I can't pretend that I have fought through all the muck yet, but I have enough so that I have a basis into which to put corrections and comments on what is missing. Thanks loccan3.blogspot.com _,_._,___This is a good, constructive overview of what's been designed so far, and it fills a needed gap, namely something to orient beginners and newcomers. I wonder if Jorge would think it's a good idea to create an "About" page at Xorban.wordpress.com. Then he could link http://loccan3.blogspot.com/2012/09/xorban-commentary.html which definitely of value, stipulating that it's John Clifford's commentary. I created a template for my own commentary at http://loglang.wordpress.com/xorban/ which contains no commentary yet, but may contain some in the future.Done: http://xorban.wordpress.com/about/ co ma'a xrxe