[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email> wrote: > > The point is that you > can't just say that all of these are covered by lV without also considering > what all else is going on -- where that lV is going to turn up in the > logical form of the sentence. The idea is for the Xorban sentence to be the logical form of the sentence, a loglang is supposed to be speakable logic. ma'a xrxe