Re: [engelang] Xorban "ju"

 

Jorge Llambías, On 05/09/2012 23:09:

> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, And Rosta<and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote:
>>
>> Would it make sense to have instead of the operator "ju", a binary
>> counterpart of "fV"? E.g. "hV"?
>
> "hV" would be equivalent to "fV ju", right?
>
> Instead of "ju" you would need something like "lV smV hV".

An extra "lV smV" would have to be in there somewhere I think.

> And instead of "ju F1 ju F2 F3", we would have "lV smV hV F1 hV F2
> F3"? That's assuming that a state of affairs in which F occurs is
> equivalent to a state of affairs, in which a state of affairs in which
> F occurs, occurs.

I was thinking that "ju X Y", or "fV ju X Y", would be equivalent to "je fa X fa Y", and then to "hV X Y".

On reflection, tho, "ju" has a useful abbreviatiory function and uses up only one CV unit. "hV", tho, wd use up an entire C, just to abbreviate "je fa X fa Y", so the answer to my original question is No.